GetTrueChargeUpload your repair order or estimate. We compare labor hours against industry book-time signals and flag inflated parts markups.
Use photos, PDFs, spreadsheets, or text files.
See the strongest specific charge before checkout.
Pay only after there are actionable findings.
Your file is analyzed for this audit and immediately discarded. It is not saved to our database.
No charge unless the preview finds charges worth disputing.
Billing dispute directory
Auto repair invoices are hard to challenge because the customer rarely sees the labor guide, technician time record, supplier invoice, or signed authorization that sits behind the final total. A shop may use flat-rate book time, charge diagnostic labor, add shop supplies, and mark up parts, but those charges still need a paper trail that matches the estimate and repair order. This hub is built to turn a repair invoice into specific review requests: which labor line needs a guide page, which part needs a supplier invoice, which fee needs authorization, and which overlap looks double counted. The audit is not a mechanic and does not say a repair was unnecessary. It checks whether the billing record gives enough support for the amount being collected before you pay or escalate the dispute.
Common billing trap
Flat-rate labor can be normal, but it becomes harder to defend when the estimate does not disclose the method, the final invoice adds manual hours, or the shop refuses to show the Mitchell, MOTOR, CCC, ALLDATA, or OEM operation used to price the work.
Common billing trap
A separate diagnostic charge may be fair when it is clearly authorized and not credited into the repair. The dispute starts when diagnosis appears as a standalone fee and the same teardown, scan, or test labor is also embedded in the approved repair operation.
Common billing trap
Repair orders often use vague part descriptions that do not reveal whether the installed part was OEM, aftermarket, recycled, remanufactured, or sublet. A strong dispute asks for the part number, supplier invoice, origin label, and authorization for that part category.
Common billing trap
Shop supplies, hazardous waste, environmental, and materials charges become suspicious when they are a percentage of labor instead of a list of materials used. The customer should ask for the policy, itemization, cap, and signed estimate language that allowed the fee.
Evidence checklist
Upload the estimate or repair order you approved before work began. It should show labor hours, hourly rate, parts, diagnostic charges, shop supplies, taxes, and the authorization language for later increases.
Include the final bill showing what was actually charged. The audit compares estimate lines against final invoice lines to identify new labor, changed parts, repeated diagnostics, and add-on percentages.
If available, include part numbers, supplier receipts, insurance estimates, technician notes, text approvals, and photos. These records help separate a legitimate supplement from an unsupported markup or duplicate operation.
Upload any message saying the car will not be released until extra charges are paid. Timing matters because surprise final-bill increases are stronger when the shop cannot show written approval before the work was performed.
Frequently asked questions
Often yes, if flat-rate pricing was disclosed and the operation matches a legitimate labor guide. The problem is not speed by itself; it is missing authorization, undisclosed manual add-ons, or overlap with another billed operation.
Ask for the signed estimate, labor-guide page, technician time record, diagnostic worksheet, and explanation of any manual labor adjustment. Those documents make the dispute factual instead of personal.
Yes, especially if the fee is vague, percentage-based, uncapped, or missing from the signed estimate. Request the fee policy, itemized materials, disposal basis, and authorization language.
No. It reviews the invoice structure and flags charges that need support. Pricing varies by market, vehicle, labor guide, and part source, so the output focuses on documentation requests and dispute leverage.